#3
AI optimization is mostly just good marketing
This article by Amanda Natividad resonated deeply with me. In the quest to answer the new shiny question of "what does AI search want", she claps back with it’s what people have always wanted (and what marketers have always advised to give ‘em).
As she puts it: "The visibility stakes are changing. The mechanics are changing. But a lot of the “new” advice keeps arriving at suspiciously familiar destinations: clear structure, specific answers, credible evidence, useful formats, and content people can actually understand."
She shows the connection between AI/LLMO/AEO/GEO/EIEIO layering to that of human needs, broken into:
- Extractability: can it be easily understood?
- Credibility: does it have a reason to ‘trust it’?
- Public evidence: is it robust, recent, and relevant?
- Retrievability: can it be accessed? (she admits this one remains specifically technical)
'Make the old seem new and novel' is a suuuuuuuper duper old trick of the marketing trade. I’m not a total curmudgeon: I’m all for recontextualizing something to help it resonate in current culture. I just caution giving 'AI' the marketing employee of the month award when all it did was plagiarize the handbook.
My question to you: what content could you tweak to add depth, relevance, and clout?